Workers assemble electronic parts at a FDI company in Bac Giang province. Experts are concerned that the enactment of GMTR would neutralise the tax incentives offered by developing countries. (Photo: VNA) |
Hanoi - As many countries plan to adopt the Global Minimum Tax Rate (GMTR) in 2024, experts are concerned that the entry into force of the rate would discourage foreign companies from locating their operations in low-tax countries.
Under GMTR rules, corporations with more than 750 million EUR in annual revenue would be subject to an effective tax rate of at least 15 per cent, not including deductions for depreciation and certain tax credits. The introduction of GMTR is aimed to increase compliance costs and create a level playing field between developed and developing countries.
The European Union has unanimously agreed to implement the rate on January 1, 2024. Japan followed suit with the enactment date being April 1, 2024. Other countries are preparing their legislation for the adoption of GMTR in the short term, including Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Republic of Korea (RoK).
Experts worried that the introduction of GMTR in other countries would cancel out the tax incentives that Vietnam has laid down for years and result in tax revenues being effectively exported to those countries.
They took RoK companies operating in Vietnam for example. These companies are subject to a preferential tax rate of 7 per cent. Once GMTR comes into force in the RoK, the companies would have to pay an additional rate of 8% to RoK tax authorities, which is the difference between the Vietnamese rate and GMTR.
Dang Ngoc Minh, Deputy Director of the General Department of Taxation, estimated that 1,015 FDI companies operating in Vietnam would be unfavourably affected by the broad-based tax rules.
He said global corporate heavyweights in the country are enjoying tax rates of between 2.75 per cent to 5.95 per cent, far lower than the GMTR of 15 per cent. As such, the implementation of GMTR abroad would cost Vietnam a couple of billions of dollars in tax loss every year.
Thomas McClelland, country tax leader at the Deloitte Vietnam Company Ltd, urged Vietnam to act quickly and decisively to adopt GMTR. Otherwise, the country would lose out to others on the differential tax revenues.
Some other experts shared this view, saying that Vietnam must be quick to bring GMTR into force to boost its tax revenues from FDI companies. But they also warned that the bandwagon would pose some new challenges for policymakers, who would have to find non-tax ways to attract FDI.
Can Van Luc, chief economist at BIDV, believed that the implementation of GMRT would put developing countries at a competitive disadvantage, especially those using fiscal incentives as a magnet for FDI.
He urged Vietnam to improve its business environment and investment climate to make up for the tax incentives that would diminish in the next few years.
"A sound business environment and investment climate are more beneficial to investors than the financial incentives offered in the form of tax cuts," said Luc.
It is also worth noting that GMRT can only be officially put in place next year under the circumstance that the Government proposes amendments to Corporate Law, Investment Law, and Tax Law to the National Assembly before October 2023.
Global fuel concerns force tax action The government is expected to apply a scheme to pare down taxes and fees for fuel products, as well as provide sufficient fuel for the economy, in a bid to offer support and ensure desired growth. |
Preparing MNCs for a global tax rate The introduction of a global minimum corporate tax on the foreign profits of multinational corporations will affect Vietnam’s own tax plans. Annett Perschmann-Taubert, tax partner at PwC Vietnam, discussed with VIR’s Luu Huong the current tax landscape and how policies should be reformed in order to maintain momentum. |
Taking on a global corporate tax rate Implementing a global minimum tax rate will create conditions to increase tax revenue from foreign enterprises, but at the same time put Vietnam in front of new challenges. Patrick Lenain and Agustin Redonda from the Council on Economic Policies in Switzerland analyse the advantages and the risks of this type of tax for Vietnam. |
What the stars mean:
★ Poor ★ ★ Promising ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good ★★★★★ Exceptional