Boeing factory move broke labor law: board

April 21, 2011 | 08:38
(0) user say
Boeing violated union labor law by opening a second production line for the new 787 Dreamliner at a non-unionized plant in South Carolina, a US government agency said Wednesday.

Boeing "violated federal labor law by deciding to transfer a second production line to a non-union facility in South Carolina for discriminatory reasons," the National Labor Relations Board said in a statement.

The board is seeking an order that would require Boeing to maintain the second 787 production line in Washington state, where the primary assembly plant is located.

It scheduled a June 14 hearing in Seattle for both sides to present their cases.

Boeing said it will "vigorously contest" the complaint.

The case stems from Boeing's decision to open a second production line for the 787, in addition to its unionized plant near Seattle.

Boeing plans to begin 787 production this summer at a new assembly plant under construction in North Charleston, South Carolina.

"Boeing has every right under both federal law and its collective bargaining agreement to build additional US production capacity outside of the Puget Sound region," Boeing's chief counsel, Michael Luttig, said in a statement.

The decision to open the South Carolina production line came after a 58-day strike in 2009 by workers from the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers over contract terms.

The NLRB said its findings supported the union's allegations that the decision was retaliation.

"In repeated statements to employees and the media, company executives cited the unionized employees' past strike activity and the possibility of strikes occurring sometime in the future as the overriding factors in deciding to locate the second line in the non-union facility," the board said.

"A worker's right to strike is a fundamental right guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act," Lafe Solomon, NLRB acting general counsel, said in the statement.

He acknowledged employers' rights to make business decisions based on their economic interests, "but they must do so within the law.

"I have worked with the parties to encourage settlement in the hope of avoiding costly litigation, and my door remains open to that possibility."

The Machinists union declared the complaint "a victory for all American workers."

The board?s action reinforces the fact that "workers have a right to join a union, and companies don?t have a right to punish them for engaging in legal union activities," said Tom Wroblewski, president of Machinists Union District Lodge 751 in Seattle.

AFP

What the stars mean:

★ Poor ★ ★ Promising ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good ★★★★★ Exceptional