Long Thanh International Airport - illustration photo
“Most National Assembly members support the government’s plan for building a state-of-art international airport to meet the country’s aviation demand and contribute to spurring economic growth,” the National Assembly’s Economic Committee noted in a report released at the ongoing National Assembly session.
The project once completed would see Vietnam boast one of Asia’s biggest airports, seeing annual throughput of 100 million passengers.
The new airport would also ease congestion on Ho Chi Minh City’s Tan Son Nhat International Airport, with the first phase to become operational in 2025.
However, lawmakers’ concerns about the cost implications came as the government reported public debt had increased rapidly from 51.7 per cent of GDP in 2010 to 60.3 per cent at the end of 2014. This is expected to reach 64 per cent in 2015.
Vietnam’s public debt had increased because of the expansion of public investment, especially in infrastructure, healthcare and education, according to the government’s report released at the session.
The Ministry of Transport (MoT) estimated total investment for the three phases of the Long Thanh airport project would reach $18.7 billion, with first phase accounting for $7.8 billion.
The government reported this project would need around $1 billion from the state budget and at least $2 billion from official development assistance sources for the first phase.
The MoT two weeks ago announced Aéroports de Paris Management – a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aéroports de Paris Group – had expressed interest in investing about $2 billion into the planned airport.
“In the context of increasing public debt and limited state budget, it is unfeasible to finance the project with state capital,” the National Assembly’s Economic Committee noted.
Nguyen Van Giau, Chairman of the committee, said the government should further explain the construction timing and how the project would be funded.
He pointed out that the government had only put together a financing package proposal for the first phase, while funds for the second and third phases remained unclear.
What the stars mean:
★ Poor ★ ★ Promising ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good ★★★★★ Exceptional