Additional oil spike impacts cannot be ruled out

June 27, 2022 | 19:30
(0) user say
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has increased global oil market volatility. The economic impact of another oil price shock, should it materialise, would be significant.
Additional oil spike impacts cannot be ruled out
Marcel Schröder, Economist, Economic Research and Regional Cooperation Department Asian Development Bank

At the beginning of the conflict, the crude oil price breached $130 per barrel in March, the highest since 2008. Since then, it retreated to about $100 in April, before rising again to $120 following the European Union’s partial ban on Russian oil in May. Some worry that the oil price could spike to $200 per barrel in the coming months and how such a shock would impact the economic prospects of Asia’s developing countries.

While many institutions, including ours, project a significantly higher oil price in 2022 compared with 2021, these predictions do not foresee $200 per barrel because they attach a low probability of a sudden shock to the global oil supply. A sudden shock is unlikely given the EU’s decision to gradually phase out Russian oil imports by the end of 2022, allowing an orderly transition to alternative supplies and keeping prices stable and affordable for consumers.

However, the possibility of a supply shock that leads to a large spike in the price of oil as high as $200 per barrel cannot be ruled out. For instance, an escalation of the conflict in Ukraine could be followed by an immediate EU ban on Russian oil. It is unlikely that other oil-exporting countries would fill the resulting shortfall of 3.5–7 million barrels per day in the short run.

For instance, Saudi Arabia recently agreed to increase supply by 200,000 barrels per day, and US shale oil producers have been reluctant to boost output despite the oil price exceeding $100 per barrel due to supply-chain disruptions and rising costs. And diverting Russian oil to third countries has challenging logistics.

In this scenario, a price of $200 per barrel would be possible given that oil markets can overshoot and the previous peak of $140 in 2008, which equates to over $180 in today’s dollars, was driven by a series of supply disruptions and did not comprise similar geopolitical issues involving sanctions against a major oil producer.

Impacts of a $200 per barrel oil price shock range from small to severe, depending on the nature of the scenario and its associated knock-on effects. A relatively benign scenario is a short-lived oil price shock in the second half of 2022 with no significant knock-on effects.

In this case, GDP growth in the region is virtually unaffected, while inflation edges up to 4.6 per cent ‒ about 1 percentage point above our baseline ‒ before receding to 2.0 per cent in 2023.

It is more plausible, however, that an escalation of the conflict, together with an oil price shock of this size, will set off significant secondary effects. One possibility is an increase in inflation expectations that requires additional monetary policy tightening and also results in falling consumer confidence and business sentiment.

Under such a scenario, developing countries in Asia experience a marked growth slowdown to 3.8 per cent in 2022, which is 1.4 percentage points below the baseline. In 2023, growth accelerates to 4.5 per cent but remains 0.7 percentage points below the baseline. Headline inflation would surge even higher to 5.3 per cent and 3.4 per cent in 2022 and 2023, respectively.

A further plausible scenario is that the spiral of higher inflation expectations and monetary policy tightening will result in global financial turmoil in early 2023, in part due to rising concerns over a global recession. In this case, developing countries in Asia would only grow by 2.3 per cent in 2023, while the G3 and several economies in the region see contractions.

In this scenario, the GDP level by the end of 2023 would be about 4 per cent lower than in the baseline, which is about two-thirds of the size of the pandemic shock in 2020.

Governments can help mitigate the impact of a high oil price. Over the short term, they should implement measures to improve energy efficiency and other conservation policies to reduce petroleum fuel imports.

Over the medium term, governments should implement pricing and subsidy reforms in the energy sector which will free up fiscal resources to enable adequate targeted support for vulnerable groups that are most impacted by high energy prices.

And over the long term, measures should be undertaken to strengthen energy security by diversifying the energy mix away from fossil fuels, and towards low or zero-carbon energy resources for power, heating, and cooling, as well as promote and invest in e-mobility vehicles and infrastructure.

By Marcel Schröder

What the stars mean:

★ Poor ★ ★ Promising ★★★ Good ★★★★ Very good ★★★★★ Exceptional